Works Cited

Adair, A., Congiusta, F., Howell, J., O’Grady, C., & Walton Radford, A. (2025). Variation in high school student, parent, and teacher attitudes toward the use of generative artificial intelligence. College Board. https://newsroom.collegeboard.org/follow-report-ai-high-schools-genai-use-and-policy-varies-academic-achievement-attainment-grade-and

AI resources. (n.d.). North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://www.dpi.nc.gov/districts-schools/districts-schools-support/digital-learning-school-connectivity/ai-resources

AlDahoul, N., Rahwan, T., & Zaki, Y. (2025). AI-generated faces influence gender stereotypes and racial homogenization. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 14449. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99623-3

Alfuth, J. (2024, October 15). Four key insights into competency-based graduation requirements. KnowledgeWorks. https://knowledgeworks.org/resources/4-insights-trends-competency-based-learning-graduation-requirements/

Anderson, J., & Winthrop, R. (2026). The disengaged teen: Helping kids learn better, feel better, and live better. Crown.

Artificial intelligence. (n.d.). Utah State Board of Education. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://schools.utah.gov/informationtechnology/artificialintelligence/index

Atcheson, A., Khan, O., Siemann, B., Jain, A., & Karahalios, K. (2025). “I’d never actually realized how big an impact it had until now”: Perspectives of university students with disabilities on generative artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3714121

Ayer, L., Boudreaux, B., Paige, J. W., Holmes, P., Blagg, T. L., & Mendon-Plasek, S. J. (2023, December 5). Artificial intelligence–based student activity monitoring for suicide risk: Considerations for K–12 schools, caregivers, government, and technology developers. RAND. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2910-1.html

Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2024). Generative AI can harm learning (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4895486). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4895486

Bearman, M., Tai, J., Dawson, P., Boud, D., & Ajjawi, R. (2024). Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(6), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2335321

Beyond the buzz: Developing the AI skills employers actually need. (2025). Lightcast. https://lightcast.io/resources/research/beyond-the-buzz-developing-the-ai-skills-employers-actually-need

Blad, E. (2023, April 12). Schools turn to AI to detect weapons. But some question the tech’s effectiveness. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/schools-turn-to-ai-to-detect-weapons-but-some-question-the-techs-effectiveness/2023/04

Brown, L. X. Z. (2020, November 16). How automated test proctoring software discriminates against disabled students. Center for Democracy & Technology. https://cdt.org/insights/how-automated-test-proctoring-software-discriminates-against-disabled-students/

Brown, L. X. Z., Shetty, R., & Richardson, M. (2020, December 3). Algorithm-driven hiring tools: Innovative recruitment or expedited disability discrimination? Center for Democracy & Technology. https://cdt.org/insights/report-algorithm-driven-hiring-tools-innovative-recruitment-or-expedited-disability-discrimination/

Bryan, C., & Lurye, S. (2025, March 12). Schools use AI to monitor kids, hoping to prevent violence. Our investigation found security risks. The Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/ai-school-chromebook-gaggle-goguardian-securly-25a3946727397951fd42324139aaf70f

Brynjolfsson, E., Chandar, B., & Chen, R. (2025, November). Canaries in the coal mine? Six facts about the recent employment effects of artificial intelligence (Working paper). Stanford Digital Economy Lab. https://digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/publications/canaries-in-the-coal-mine/

Bughin, J., & van Zeebroeck, N. (2018, September 10). 3 “AI divides” and what we can do about them. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/09/the-promise-and-pitfalls-of-ai/

Burke, M., & Schuppe, J. (2025, January 24). AI weapon detection system at Antioch High School failed to detect gun in Nashville shooting. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ai-weapon-detection-system-antioch-high-school-failed-detect-gun-nashv-rcna189025

Cabitza, F., Campagner, A., & Simone, C. (2021). The need to move away from agential-AI: Empirical investigations, useful concepts and open issues. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 155, 102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102696

Caffrey, M. (2022, July 26). Spending on school security tops $3 billion, with focus on new surveillance and tech. EdWeek: Market Brief. https://marketbrief.edweek.org/education-market/spending-on-school-security-tops-3-billion-with-focus-on-new-surveillance-and-tech/2022/07

Carter, L., Liu, D., & Cantrell, C. (2020). Exploring the intersection of the digital divide and artificial intelligence: A hermeneutic literature review. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 12(4), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00138

Casebourne, I., & Wegerif, R. (2025, October 28). AI and education for collective intelligence: A futures perspective. UNESCO. Retrieved January 5, 2026, from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-and-education-collective-intelligence-futures-perspective

Chee, H., Ahn, S., & Lee, J. (2025). A competency framework for AI literacy: Variations by different learner groups and an implied learning pathway. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 2146–2182. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13556

Chen Kulesa, A., Mission, M., Croft, M., & Wells, M. K. (2025). Productive struggle: How artificial intelligence is changing learning, effort, and youth development in education. Bellwether. https://bellwether.org/publications/productive-struggle/

Chiu, T. K. F., Ahmad, Z., Ismailov, M., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024). What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171

Consortium for School Networking. (2025). Operational AI in education: Readiness, realities, and the road ahead—A CoSN 2025 member survey. https://www.cosn.org/tools-and-resources/resource/operational-ai-in-education-a-cosn-2025-member-survey/

Cross, J. L., Choma, M. A., & Onofrey, J. A. (2024). Bias in medical AI: Implications for clinical decision-making. PLOS Digital Health, 3(11), e0000651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000651

Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2

Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544

Fernández-Batanero, J.-M., Román-Graván, P., Reyes-Rebollo, M.-M., & Montenegro-Rueda, M. (2021). Impact of educational technology on teacher stress and anxiety: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020548

Fitzpatrick, D. (2025, August 6). Google takes aim at ChatGPT study mode with major Gemini updates. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danfitzpatrick/2025/08/06/google-takes-aim-at-chatgpt-study-mode-with-major-gemini-updates/

Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2022). Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Information Systems Research, 33(2), 678–696. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1079

Garcia, A. (2023, April 10). Technology might be making education worse. Stanford Report. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2023/04/technology-might-be-making-education-worse

Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006

Giuliano, G. (2025, September 20). The AI literacy gap: What society knows, what it needs to know, and why it matters—Foundation for AI literacy (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5509938). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5509938

Habib, S., Vogel, T., Anli, X., & Thorne, E. (2024). How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? Journal of Creativity, 34(1), 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072

Hao, Z., Jiang, J., Yu, J., Liu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Student-AI interaction in an LLM-empowered learning environment: A cluster analysis of engagement profiles (arXiv:2503.01694). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.01694

Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942

Heubeck, E. (2025, January 27). Middle school is tough for boys. One school found the “secret sauce” for success. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/middle-school-is-tough-for-boys-one-school-found-the-secret-sauce-for-success/2025/01

Heyman, J. L., Rick, S. R., Giacomelli, G., Wen, H., Laubacher, R. J., Taubenslag, N., Ragupathy, P., Curhan, J., Malone, T. W., Knicker, M. S., & Jeddi, Y. (2024). Supermind ideator: How scaffolding human-AI collaboration can increase creativity. Collective Intelligence, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137241305117

Hofmann, V., Kalluri, P. R., Jurafsky, D., & King, S. (2024). AI generates covertly racist decisions about people based on their dialect. Nature, 633, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07856-5

Holstein, K., & Aleven, V. (2022). Designing for human–AI complementarity in K–12 education. AI Magazine, 43(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12058

Holt, L. (2024). The 5 percent problem: Online mathematics programs may benefit most the kids who need it least. Education Next, 24(4), 26–31.

Huang, Y., Gao, C., Zhou, Y., Guo, K., Wang, X., Cohen-Sasson, O., Lamparth, M., & Zhang, X. (2025). Prioritization first, principles second: An adaptive interpretation of helpful, honest, and harmless principles (arXiv:2502.06059). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.06059

Human-centered artificial intelligence in schools. (n.d.). Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://ospi.k12.wa.us/student-success/resources-subject-area/human-centered-artificial-intelligence-schools

James, W. (2024, November 13). Ensuring digital accessibility in K-12 schools in a technology-driven era. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/ensuring-digital-accessibility-in-k-12-schools-in-a-technology-driven-era/

Kaufman, J. H., Woo, A., Eagan, J., Lee, S., & Kassan, E. B. (2025). Uneven adoption of artificial intelligence tools among U.S. teachers and principals in the 2023–2024 school year. RAND. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA134-25.html

Keierleber, M. (2020, October 18). ‘Don’t get gaggled’: Minneapolis school district spends big on student surveillance tool, raising ire after terminating its police contract. The 74 . https://www.the74million.org/article/dont-get-gaggled-minneapolis-school-district-spends-big-on-student-surveillance-tool-raising-ire-after-terminating-its-police-contract/

Kelly, D., & Burkell, J. (2025). A new kind of cognitive tool: Generative AI and the future of critical and creative thinking in education. Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14721/38901

Kitsara, I. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the digital divide: From an innovation perspective. In A. Bounfour (Ed.), Platforms and artificial intelligence (pp. 245–265). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90192-9_12

Krupp, L., Steinert, S., Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, M., Avila, K. E., Lukowicz, P., Kuhn, J., Küchemann, S., & Karolus, J. (2024). Unreflected acceptance—Investigating the negative consequences of ChatGPT-assisted problem solving in physics education. In F. Lorig, J. Tucker, A. Dahlgren Lindström, F. Dignum, P. K. Murukannaiah, A. Theodorou, & P. Yolum (Eds.), HHAI 2024: Hybrid human AI systems for the social good (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. 386, pp. 199–212). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240195

Laird, E., Dwyer, M., & Quay-de la Vallee, H. (2025a, October 8). Hand in hand: Schools’ embrace of AI connected to increased risks to students. Center for Democracy & Technology. https://cdt.org/insights/hand-in-hand-schools-embrace-of-ai-connected-to-increased-risks-to-students/

Laird, E., Dwyer, M., & Woelfel, K. (2025b, January 15). Out of step: Students, teachers in stride with edtech threats while parents are left behind. Center for Democracy & Technology. https://cdt.org/insights/out-of-step-students-teachers-in-stride-with-edtech-threats-while-parents-are-left-behind/

LeFebvre, J., & Master, S. (2024, February 28). Expiration of federal K-12 emergency funds could pose challenges for states. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. https://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/expiration-of-federal-k-12-emergency-funds-could-pose-challenges-for

Lehmann, M., Cornelius, P. B., & Sting, F. J. (2025). AI meets the classroom: When do large language models harm learning? (arXiv:2409.09047). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.09047

Leopold, T. (2025, April 30). How AI is reshaping the career ladder, and other trends in jobs and skills on Labour Day. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/04/ai-jobs-international-workers-day/

Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023). GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. Patterns, 4(7), 100779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779

Lurye, S. (2025, August 8). Students have been called to the office—and even arrested—for AI surveillance false alarms. The Associated Press. https://www.ap.org/news-highlights/best-of-the-week/honorable-mention/2025/students-have-been-called-to-the-office-and-even-arrested-for-ai-surveillance-false-alarms/

Lynch, S. (2025, May 19). Closing the digital divide in AI. Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. https://hai.stanford.edu/news/closing-the-digital-divide-in-ai

Marshall, D. T., Moore, T., & Pressley, T. (2025, January 7). Technology is supposed to decrease teacher burnout—but we found it can sometimes make it worse. The Conversation. https://doi.org/10.64628/AAI.x5csxcuaa

McGee, N. J., Kozleski, E., Lemons, C. J., & Hau, I. C. (2025). AI + learning differences: Designing a future with no boundaries. Stanford Accelerator for Learning. https://acceleratelearning.stanford.edu/app/uploads/2025/07/AI-Learning-Differences-Designing-a-Future-with-No-Boundaries_Final.pdf

Merod, A. (2023, June 9). ESSER tech purchases helped keep schools running remotely during pandemic. K-12 Dive. https://www.k12dive.com/news/ESSER-ed-tech-purchases-pandemic/652593/

Moore, J., Grabb, D., Agnew, W., Klyman, K., Chancellor, S., Ong, D. C., & Haber, N. (2025). Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providers. FAccT '25: Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 599–627. https://doi.org/10.1145/3715275.3732039

Next Generation Learning Challenges. (n.d.). Exploring portrait of a graduate in practice across the US: How students develop the skills & competencies in a portrait of a graduate. Retrieved January 6, 2026, from https://www.nextgenlearning.org/portrait-of-a-graduate-in-practice

Nichols, T. P., & Monea, A. (2022). De-escalating ‘dataveillance’ in schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 104(4), 23–27. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00317217221142978

Pew Research Center.(2025, November 20). Internet, broadband fact sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/

Polikoff, M., Rapaport, A., & Fast, N. (2025, January). What do parents know about generative AI in schools? Center on Reinventing Public Education. https://crpe.org/what-do-parents-know-about-generative-ai-in-schools/

Reinhart, J. M., Thomas, E., & Toriskie, J. M. (2011). K-12 teachers: Technology use and the second level digital divide. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38(3–4), 181–193. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ966923

Riley, B., & Bruno, P. (2024). Education hazards of generative AI. Cognitive Resonance.

Ritter, C. (2025, July 17). Parents are right to want AI in K-12 education. EdChoice. https://www.edchoice.org/2025-parents-are-right-to-want-ai-in-k-12-education/

Rocha, N. (2026, January 7). Google and Character.AI to Settle Lawsuit Over Teenager’s Death. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/07/technology/google-characterai-teenager-lawsuit.html

Satariano, A., Mozur, P., Russell, K., & Kim, J. (2025, June 21). The global A.I. divide: Where A.I. data centers are located. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/06/23/technology/ai-computing-global-divide.html

Schmutz, J. B., Outland, N., Kerstan, S., Georganta, E., & Ulfert, A.-S. (2024). AI-teaming: Redefining collaboration in the digital era. Current Opinion in Psychology, 58, 101837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101837

Sidoti, O., Park, E., & Gottfried, J. (2025, January 15). About a quarter of U.S. teens have used ChatGPT for schoolwork – double the share in 2023. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/01/15/about-a-quarter-of-us-teens-have-used-chatgpt-for-schoolwork-double-the-share-in-2023/

Sidra, S., & Mason, C. (2025). Generative AI in human-AI collaboration: Validation of the collaborative AI literacy and collaborative AI metacognition scales for effective use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2543997

Smith, J. M., Dukes, J., Sheldon, J., Nnamani, M. N., Esteves, N., & Reich, J. (2025). A guide to AI in schools: Perspectives for the perplexed. https://tsl.mit.edu/ai-guidebook/

Stadler, M., Bannert, M., & Sailer, M. (2024). Cognitive ease at a cost: LLMs reduce mental effort but compromise depth in student scientific inquiry. Computers in Human Behavior, 160, 108386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108386

State of Rhode Island Department of Education. (n.d.). Proficiency-based learning. Retrieved December 17, 2025, from https://ride.ri.gov/students-families/education-programs/proficiency-based-learning

State of Vermont Agency of Education. (n.d.). Proficiency-based graduation requirements. Retrieved December 17, 2025, from https://education.vermont.gov/student-learning/proficiency-based-learning/proficiency-based-graduation-requirements

Suárez, D., & García-Mariñoso, B. (2025). On the verge of a digital divide in the use of generative AI? Telecommunications Policy, 49(7), 102997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.102997

Sun, L., & Zhou, L. (2024). Does generative artificial intelligence improve the academic achievement of college students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(7), 1676–1713. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241277937

Szmyd, K., & Mitera, E. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on the development of critical thinking skills in students. European Research Studies, XXVII(2), 1022–1039.

Talk, trust, and trade-offs: How and why teens use AI companions. (2025). Common Sense Media. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/talk-trust-and-trade-offs-how-and-why-teens-use-ai-companions

Trump, D. J. (2025). Advancing artificial intelligence education for American youth. [Executive Order]. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/advancing-artificial-intelligence-education-for-american-youth/

Urban, M., Děchtěrenko, F., Lukavský, J., Hrabalová, V., Svacha, F., Brom, C., & Urban, K. (2024). ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study. Computers & Education, 215, 105031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031

United States White House. (2025). Winning the race: America’s AI action plan. https://www.ai.gov/action-plan

Vaccaro, M., Almaatouq, A., & Malone, T. (2024). When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(12), 2293–2303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02024-1

van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity.

Wang, A., Rysbek, A., Huber, A., Nambiar, A., Kenolty, A., Caulfield, B., Lilley-Draper, B., Groot, B., Veprek, B., Burdett, C., Willis, C., Barton, C., Smith, D., Mu, G., Walters, H., Jurenka, I., Hulls, I., Stalley-Moores, J., Caton, J., … Brazão, V. (2025a). AI tutoring can safely and effectively support students: An exploratory RCT in UK classrooms (arXiv:2512.23633). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.23633

Wang, C., Boerman, S. C., Kroon, A. C., Möller, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2025b). The artificial intelligence divide: Who is the most vulnerable? New Media & Society, 27(7), 3867–3889. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241232345

Wang, J., & Fan, W. (2025c). The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: Insights from a meta-analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 621. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04787-y

Wang, M., Tlili, A., Khribi, M. K., Lo, C. K., & Huang, R. (2025d). Generative artificial intelligence in special education: A systematic review through the lens of the mediated-action model. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251335655

Whittaker, M., Alper, M., Bennett, C. L., Hendren, S., Kaziunas, L., Mills, M., Ringel Morris, M., Rankin, J., Rogers, E., Salas, M., & Myers West, S. (2019). Disability, bias, and AI report. AI Now Institute. https://ainowinstitute.org/publications/disabilitybiasai-2019

Xu, T., & Wang, H. (2024). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on English language learning achievement. System, 125, 103428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103428

Young, J., Bevan, D., & Sanders, M. (2024). How productive is the productive struggle? Lessons learned from a scoping review. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(2), 470–495. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3364

Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

Zomer, C., Pangrazio, L., & Matovich, I. (2025). The dashboard school: Governing teachers, students and parents in the data-driven school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2025.2519383